Regulatory update · Commission delegated act on Simplified ESRS expected by mid-2026 · Application from FY 2027 · See full timeline →
Hub · Double Materiality · Updated April 2026

The complete guide to the Double Materiality Assessment under the Simplified ESRS, Directive (EU) 2026/47 and EFRAG Implementation Guidance 1. For enterprises preparing for Wave 2 CSRD reporting and SMEs aligning to the Voluntary SME Standard.

EFRAG IG 1 aligned Simplified ESRS ready Post-Omnibus I
Live · Materiality Explorer
ImpactMaterial
DoubleMaterial
FinancialMaterial
NotMaterial
0 Double material
0 Impact only
0 Financial only
0 Not material
Drag any topic across the lenses to classify it

The undertaking’s effect on people and the environment

Impact materiality relates to the actual and potential impacts — positive and negative — that the undertaking has on the environment and on people, including workers, value-chain actors, affected communities and consumers. It is assessed regardless of whether those impacts create financial consequences for the undertaking itself.

Under ESRS 1, impacts are assessed across the undertaking’s own operations and its upstream and downstream value chain. Where a potential negative human rights impact is identified, severity takes precedence over likelihood.

Source: ESRS 1 §43–45; EFRAG IG 1 §2.2
Scale
How grave is the impact on people or the environment.
Scope
How widespread the impact is — number of people affected or breadth of environmental damage.
Irremediability
How difficult it is to remediate or reverse the harm.
Likelihood
For potential impacts only — the probability of the impact occurring.

Sustainability effects on the undertaking

Financial materiality addresses the sustainability matters that trigger, or could reasonably be expected to trigger, financial effects on the undertaking — its development, performance, position, cost of capital or access to finance, in the short, medium or long term.

This lens aligns with the IFRS S1 / ISSB concept of materiality, enabling interoperability. A sustainability matter may give rise to risks that erode value, or opportunities that create it.

Source: ESRS 1 §49; EFRAG–ISSB Interoperability Guidance (May 2024)
Magnitude
The size of the financial effect on the undertaking’s performance or position.
Likelihood
The probability that the financial effect will materialise.
Time horizon
Short-term (≤ 1 year), medium-term (1–5 years), long-term (> 5 years).
Dependency
Reliance on natural, human or social resources at appropriate price and quality.

The combined lens

A sustainability matter is material to the undertaking when it meets the criteria for impact materiality, financial materiality, or both. The DMA process identifies material matters across both lenses, with the outcome determining which ESRS disclosure requirements apply.

Under the Simplified ESRS, materiality operates as an overarching filter: only material information is disclosed. The fair presentation principle governs the sustainability statement as a whole.

Source: ESRS 1 §19–32 (Simplified); EFRAG technical advice, 3 December 2025
Either threshold
Impact OR financial materiality is sufficient.
Interaction
Impact-material matters often become financially material over time, and vice versa.
Proportionality
Reasonable and supportable information available without undue cost or effort, per Simplified ESRS 1.
Fair presentation
The assessment must produce a complete, neutral and accurate depiction of material IROs.

Where we are, where we’re going.

The regulatory architecture for double materiality has moved rapidly through 2025 and into 2026. The timeline below tracks every material milestone from the original CSRD through to the expected delegated act adoption.

Jan 2023

CSRD enters into force

Directive (EU) 2022/2464 makes the double materiality assessment a legal requirement for in-scope undertakings.

Directive (EU) 2022/2464
Jul 2023

ESRS Set 1 adopted

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 adopts the first set of European Sustainability Reporting Standards.

Delegated Reg. (EU) 2023/2772
May 2024

EFRAG IG 1 published

EFRAG Implementation Guidance 1 — Materiality Assessment — provides the authoritative illustrative DMA process.

EFRAG IG 1 (final)
Feb 2025

Omnibus I package proposed

Commission proposes the “Omnibus” simplification package (COM(2025) 80 and 81) to amend the CSRD, CSDDD and EU Taxonomy.

COM(2025) 80 · COM(2025) 81
Jul 2025

ESRS exposure drafts

EFRAG publishes exposure drafts of 12 revised ESRS for public consultation, proposing ~61% reduction in mandatory datapoints.

EFRAG Sustainability Reporting Board
Dec 2025

EFRAG technical advice delivered

On 3 December 2025, EFRAG submits its final technical advice on the Simplified ESRS to the European Commission.

EFRAG Simplified ESRS
Feb 2026

Directive (EU) 2026/47 published

The Detailed Omnibus Directive published in the Official Journal on 26 February 2026; raises CSRD thresholds to 1,000 employees and €450m turnover.

Directive (EU) 2026/47
Mar 2026

Directive in force

Directive (EU) 2026/47 enters into force on 18 March 2026, twenty days after publication.

OJEU 26 February 2026
Mid-2026

Delegated act on revised ESRS

Commission expected to adopt the delegated act amending the ESRS. Feedback period of one month, then Parliament and Council scrutiny.

Awaiting adoption
FY 2026

Voluntary early application

Once the delegated act is adopted, undertakings reporting for FY 2026 may voluntarily apply the Simplified ESRS early.

Commission signal
FY 2027

Simplified ESRS application

First mandatory reporting year under the Simplified ESRS for Wave 2 undertakings (1,000+ employees, €450m+ turnover).

Post-Omnibus I timeline
Scroll horizontally to explore the full timeline

The DMA in four steps.

EFRAG Implementation Guidance 1 sets out a principles-based, four-step process. The Simplified ESRS permits both top-down and bottom-up approaches. Select any step for the detail.

What the first wave revealed.

EFRAG’s 2025 implementation review and the first tranche of Wave 1 CSRD filings surface clear patterns in how undertakings are — and are not — applying the DMA.

> 40%
of reviewed undertakings lacked a robust double materiality assessment.
EFRAG 2025 implementation review
61%
reduction in mandatory datapoints under the Simplified ESRS.
EFRAG technical advice, Dec 2025
< 30%
fully aligned their governance and risk disclosures with ESRS 2.
EFRAG 2025 report
10 topics
core ESRS topic areas assessed (E1–E5, S1–S4, G1).
ESRS 1 AR 16

ESRS, ISSB, GRI, SASB.

Double materiality is a feature of the European standards. Other frameworks take different approaches. The comparison below clarifies what each requires, and how they interoperate.

CriterionESRS (EU)IFRS S1/S2 (ISSB)GRISASB
Materiality conceptDouble materialityFinancial (enterprise value)Impact (stakeholder)Financial (investor)
Primary audienceInvestors + stakeholdersInvestors / capital providersBroad stakeholder setInvestors
Value chain scopeOwn ops + up + downstreamOwn ops + value chainOwn ops + value chainOwn operations
Assurance requiredLimited (→ reasonable)JurisdictionalVoluntaryVoluntary
Legal basisDirective + Delegated Reg.IFRS Foundation standardVoluntary global standardStandard (merged into IFRS)
Interoperability with ESRSInteroperability Guidance (May 2024)High (impact materiality)High (financial materiality)

Regulatory updates and analysis.

The feed below tracks the most recent developments affecting the DMA — from Commission adoption progress to EFRAG guidance updates and ESMA enforcement priorities.

Double Materiality — the complete guide to ESRS, CSRD and the DMA

The full 2,850-word reference: legal basis, both materiality lenses, the four-step EFRAG IG 1 process, threshold-setting, stakeholder engagement, disclosure obligations, Omnibus I changes, and what Wave 1 filers got wrong. EFRAG-only sources, April 2026.

Omnibus I explained: what changed for double materiality

Directive (EU) 2026/47 retains the principle but narrows scope and reduces datapoint volume. A section-by-section read.

The Simplified ESRS and the DMA

Top-down mode, fair presentation framing, and the end of annual full re-runs. What EFRAG’s December 2025 advice changes in practice.

Conduct a DMA in four steps

A field guide aligned to EFRAG IG 1: context mapping, IRO identification, scoring, and reporting under ESRS 2 IRO-1 and IRO-2.

Top-down vs bottom-up DMA

Which approach fits your organisation — and how the Simplified ESRS 1 accommodates both, with qualitative analysis sufficient where the conclusion is clear.

VSME and the SME pathway

How the Voluntary SME Standard defines the simplified materiality assessment — and what the trickle-down cap under Omnibus I means for suppliers.

EFRAG IG 1 explained

The Materiality Assessment Implementation Guidance is non-authoritative but central. What it says, what changed in 2024, and how it applies under the Simplified ESRS.

Double materiality and ESG reporting: how the DMA shapes CSRD disclosures

How the DMA flows downstream into the sustainability statement — ESRS 2 IRO-1, IRO-2 and SBM-3 explained, with a breakdown of the four documentation artefacts that feed the assurance process.

Frequently asked questions.

Eight questions grounded in EFRAG and Commission primary sources. Expand any question for the reference.

What is double materiality?

Is double materiality still required after the Omnibus I Directive?

Which ESRS version should I apply for FY 2026?

What is the difference between top-down and bottom-up DMA?

How often must a DMA be updated?

What is the difference between impact and financial materiality?

Do SMEs need to conduct a double materiality assessment?

How does the DMA connect to ESRS 2 IRO-1 and IRO-2 disclosures?

Your full DMA, free forever.

The GIG Double Materiality Assessment platform covers the complete EFRAG IG 1 workflow: context mapping, IRO analysis, dual-perspective scoring, stakeholder engagement, materiality matrix and audit-grade documentation. Start free. Upgrade when you need multi-entity, group consolidation, or assurance-ready exports.

Start your free DMA
No card required EFRAG IG 1 aligned Simplified ESRS ready
Context
Complete
IROs
42 / 51
Scoring
Ongoing
Stakeholders
18 / 33
Matrix
Draft